Microsoft Live Meeting Client For Mac

Client

Hosting/Joining Microsoft Office Live Meeting | 5 comments | Create New Account
Click here to return to the 'Hosting/Joining Microsoft Office Live Meeting' hint

In Outlook, click Help Check For Updates. If an update is found, download and install it. Restart Outlook. If the problem continues, click Help Contact Support. Apr 29, 2014  Microsoft Office Live Meeting 2007 Client security and download notice Download.hr periodically updates software information of Microsoft Office Live Meeting 2007 Client from the software publisher (Microsoft), but some information may be slightly out-of-date or incorrect. Jul 26, 2012 Here’s where it gets frustratingyou cannot connect to Communications Server through the Live Meeting web interface. And, since there is no installable Live Meeting client for Mac, you have no options. Here’s the explanation I received from a Microsoft Live Meeting support person.

The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.

Yeah, it's too much to ask for the CIO to adopt a facility (e.g. Adobe Connect) that actually works cross-platform....

I'm a bit surprise as I was a beta tester in my company when we choose our next solution for video conferencing.
And Livemeting was running (poorly) on Mac OS X. When I say poorly, It was using a lot of CPU and the shared screen was refreshing slowly on other party when I was hosting.
Now there is also WebEx (Cisco) with client on iPad, iPhone, Mac OS X, Windows. Features set is rich, sharing a windows, all windows of an app, desktop, camera.
There is gotomeeting (Citrix), on Windows sharing a windows, all windows of an app, not reliable on WinXP apparently, on Mac OS X you can sahre only the desktop, at least it shares one screen.

Microsoft Live Meeting Client For Mac Free

'Sweet' is not a term I would use to describe this 'solution'

Microsoft Live Meeting Client Mac

I don't think this qualifies as a hint. Running something in a VM because there isn't a native version is just plain obvious!

I agree, add this one to the ever mounting pile of non-hints.
As previously commented, it is a little too obvious — if a windows program has no equivalent for the mac, then the obvious step to get the functionality for that app running on your mac, is to run it in a Virtual Machine.
If the editor's idea behind this is to get it into the big google index, then think about it. If you were searching for a Mac way to run X, Y or Z and came across this hint as a 'solution' then, guaranteed, the next thing to occur would surely be your palm meeting your forehead.
A more progressive version of this hint, might be to use one of the free/paid software as a service or VM hosting services out there, that might have solved this particular hurdle the author faced, and certainly other situations where Mac versions of the same app are not available.
I would much prefer quality over quantity on this site. It appears over the last few months a minimum quota is trying to be met, and is being filled with lots of 'non hints'.
Plus the instructions for this hint describe it as 'short and sweet'. I would say it is neither short nor sweet.